Helping Writers Revise

M. P. Barker: Class of 2k8

authors April 14th, 2008

This is part of a year-long series about those intrepid newcomers, The Class of 2k8. To help marketing efforts for debut novelists, these 28 novelists have banded together to create a group marketing effort.

M.P. Barker

difficult boy A Difficult Boy, Holiday House.

Revising A Difficult Boy

Some writers claim to lo-o-o-ve revision. Then again, some people claim to love liver, shoveling snow, and, for all I know, root canal. Personally, I hate, loathe, and despise revising.

For me, each sentence comes torturously slowly, after hours of procrastinatorial cogitation and multiple permutations before I settle on it. By the time my “first” draft is complete, I’ve already done a lot of revising-as-I-go and have exhausted whatever spark of creativity prompted it. To revisit it is like going to a well long drawn dry.

On top of that, I am not one of those people who can write short. Nor am I one of those writers who can work from an outline. I take my characters, point them in a vague direction (sometimes no direction at all) and see what they’ll do. This leads to a story arc that looks more like an EKG than a bell curve. The first draft of A Difficult Boy was more than 700 pages long. So how did I trim more than 400 pages of flabby writing and unsightly prose? Patient friends and lots of office supplies.

Slashing a Mss in Half

  • Stage #1 (700 pages down to 500) – Four writer friends gave the manuscript a thorough going-over. If a section made all four hold their noses, I could be pretty sure that it really and truly did stink. I also remembered to grovel shamelessly in gratitude, because I could never have afforded to pay them.
  • Stage #2 (500 pages to 350) – I got a bulletin board, push pins, highlighters, scissors, tape, and Post-it notes. I assigned each character a different color highlighter, and assigned a letter code to each of the plot points or themes. I created a table with columns for: chapter and scene, time and setting, action, purpose of the scene, and themes or issues. I tacked the chart up on the bulletin board. Then I applied the highlighters and letter codes to the chart. That made it easy to see what was redundant or needed re-arranging. Then I got busy with the scissors, tape, and Post-it notes (plus one additional patient friend)…and the wastebasket. The 350-page version got me my agent and my publisher.
  • Stage #3 (350 pages to 275) – After receiving the five-page editorial letter pointing out all the book’s flaws, I spent three months staring at the manuscript, whining, accomplishing nothing, and in dire need of anti-depressants. A friend offered to help me by red-lining surplus paragraphs and sentences. She didn’t stop there, however, and began giving advice about major structural changes, which I received very ungraciously. We stayed up until two in the morning, me being a total witch, and her trying very hard to be helpful. I went to bed not knowing whether I should kill my friend, my editor, or myself, but certain I should flush the book. After three hours’ sleep, I woke up knowing exactly what to do. I pounded out a new outline in about two hours, and got the revisions done only a week behind schedule—much to my editor’s relief, I’m sure. My friend forgave me, my book will be coming out in April, and I owe my friend a hand-made shawl.

M.P. Barker, April 2008.

Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

Jacobs, Meyers and more

authors, links April 10th, 2008

Successful Reviser

Read the interview with author Deborah Lynn Jacobs about her newest novel, CHOICES. She brought this manuscript to the 2005 Novel Revision Retreat, then revised and revised.

The workbook for the retreat Novel Metamorphosis is now available.
And the online Novel Metamorphosis class is taking registrations for the May/June class.

Strange Rules for the Road

Stephanie Meyers has strange rules of the road. (Thanks to The Longstockings blog.) Doesn’t she like the fans of Twilight, Breaking Dawn“>New Moon, Breaking Dawn“>New Moon“>Eclipse and the newest Breaking Dawn?

Other Links

Janni Simner find that waiting to revise will pay off. That’s right off she kills off the Tertiary Character. Janni, you gotta stop talking to your characters before you know if they will stay or go!

Anastasia Suen has a new Children’s and YA Lit Blog Reviewer’s List. Fabulous resource.

Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

Zu Vincent: Class of 2k8

authors April 7th, 2008

This is part of a year-long series about those intrepid newcomers, The Class of 2k8. To help marketing efforts for debut novelists, these 28 novelists have banded together to create a group marketing effort.

Zu Vincent, lucky placeThe Lucky Place , Front Street Press

“A quietly powerful and important story. Zu’s vignettes weave a novel that, from moment to moment, takes your breath—then gently hands it back to you again. Lovely.”
—Jacqueline Woodson on The Lucky Place (Front Street Press)

Zu Vincent tells this story about revising The Lucky Place:

Revision is about shape. The shape your story is in and the shape you want it to become. Part of this shaping happens in line edits and choosing the best, most evocative words, but before you look at the nuts and bolts, look to your characters. Study, as John Gardner put it, the fortunes of those characters. And give those fortunes to us.

As Gardner warned, characters can’t be murky, as if seen through shower glass. They need to emerge exquisitely drawn in our sight.

Ironically, the way to do this is not to expand—but to narrow—characters in revision.

Think of Charlie Chaplin in his constricting black suit, with his tilty walk and twitchy mustache. He’s created in such thin detail he jumps to life on the screen. And that detail is thin because it exists only for the world of Chaplin, like the cartoon desert exists for Road Runner. Yes Chaplin is odd and quirky, but we see this so clearly because he’s tightly drawn in those details. And being tightly drawn, he’s made familiar.

Look for the Chaplin in your characters when you revise. Make them stand out by making them human, in all their odd vulnerability. Not only in their appearance but in their heart and in the heart of their world. Characters are shaped by this world and have something of their own at stake. They don’t simply react to another character’s desires, but have desires of their own.

That’s why shaping in revision isn’t just mechanical, but emotional at its core. It’s shaping the soul of your story until it rings true. Until the truth you hear in your head is sounding loud on the page.

As Paul Klee said of art, “Only after the writer lets literature shape her can she perhaps shape literature…. Art must enter the body… a painter cannot use paint like glue or screws to fasten down the world.” Rather, “You adapt yourself,” Klee said, “to the contents of the paint box.”

What characters have emerged from your paint box? How can they be more finely drawn? Characters don’t so much come from real life as from the story canvas you’ve created. They live in the world on your page and that world is woven not only from its people but from its plot and setting, too.

Even before you revise, listen to what your characters are saying and doing, look at the world you’ve set them in, because most often the answers to what you need next are already floating there, dredged up from the subconscious, waiting for you to notice. Waiting for you to dig in and give them final shape.

For more about the author, see www.zuvincent.com or the Y28 website.

2k8 Stories

Look for these other 2k8 Stories:

March: Jody Feldman
April: Zu Vincent
April: M.P. Barker
May: Sarah Prineas
June: Daphne Grab
July: N.A. Nelson
August: Laurel Snyder
September: Nancy Viau
October: Ellen Booraem
October: P.J. Hoover
October: Courtney Sheinmel

Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

Jody Feldman: Class of 2k8

authors March 4th, 2008

Today begins a year-long series about those intrepid newcomers, The Class of 2k8. To help marketing efforts for debut novelists, these 28 novelists have banded together to create a group marketing effort. I’m thrilled that three authors in this group have taken my novel revision retreat; two of them sold the novel they brought to the retreat, Kristin Tubb and Jenny Meyerhoff.
I’ll feature some of them here this year, as they talk about their Revision Stories or The Office Studios.

Jody Feldman Cuts Straight to the Action

The Gollywhopper Gamesgollywhopper games, Greenwillow Press

When my agent fielded the offer on The Gollywhopper Games, the editor told her I would need to make some substantial changes. Was the author capable of that? Yes, my agent assured her, then called to give me all The News. Although I was beyond elated, those dreaded words, Substantial Changes, shot into my every extremity.

Other people knew how to make Substantial Changes. Real writers. Not me.

Even so, my editor mailed me a preliminary revision letter. My main task, cut the first 50 pages nearly in half. Slash. Burn. Yet still retain the necessary backstory and the detailed information to set up the guts of the book.

Other people knew how to do that. Real writers. Not me.

After I hyperventilated (not really) and woke up several mornings with hives (really), I decided, instead, to embrace what I knew about the process:

  • Trust those who know.
    I’m not saying you need to agree with everything editors or more seasoned writers say, but you should at least consider why they are giving you specific advice. My editor was right. Kids would want to get into the main action and not be bogged down by every detail. At more than one point she said something to the effect, “YOU needed to know this. Do your readers?” My first answer? Yes, they did need to know. The truth? Nope. Several scenes, gone.
  • You don’t need to swallow everything in one gulp.
    Along with Substantial Changes were those far less intimidating. While I mulled over the huge ones, I tackled others I could fix in minutes. Can he be funnier here? Would she really say that? Because I gained confidence doing the little things. I broke Substantial Changes into bite-sized pieces. I took just one scene, at first, to see how I could add layers to a character. On the next pass of that scene, I conquered pacing. The next, heightened sensory details. And, in the end, I rewarded myself by entering my comfort zone: line editing.
  • What you’ve written isn’t fact.
    You may have read your story so many times you begin to believe the words on paper represent the honest, unadulterated truth. Reality? Those words are your imagination in black and white. I had to remember my own imagination still had life when my editor wanted me to add some action into a chapter that had remained nearly unchanged through many drafts. I can’t, I thought, that’s not the way it happened. But I shook that feeling and opened my mind to a new scene that had never before existed. (And honestly, at the point where I was trying to cut 25 pages and needed to add a scene? It felt like someone told me to lose 25 pounds by drinking malted milks.) With that new scene, however, not only did I pick up the pace, but I added two very minor characters who helped illustrate some backstory in far fewer words and in a far more interesting way than I had done elsewhere. Many more words deleted.

It took several back-and-forths with the Greenwillow editorial team until I became one of those Other People with an editor-approved revision behind me. The hives eventually whimpered away, and my middle grade novel, The Gollywhopper Gamesgollywhopper games is due in stores on March 4, new scenes and all.

About the book:

In the beginning, there are 25,000 contestants; in the end, just five. Does Gil Goodson have what it takes to win The Gollywhopper Games? Do you?
The Gollywhopper Games has just been named a Spring 2008 BookSense Pick.

About the author:

Jody Feldman has played around with games, puzzles and brainteasers for as long as she can remember. Sometimes, she even thinks of revision process as a giant puzzle. She lives in St. Louis, Missouri. Visit her website at www.jodyfeldman.com or play some games at www.gollywhoppergames.com .

2k8 Stories

Look for these other 2k8 Stories:

March: Jody Feldman
April: Zu Vincent
April: M.P. Barker
May: Sarah Prineas
June: Daphne Grab
July: N.A. Nelson
August: Laurel Snyder
September: Nancy Viau
October: Ellen Booraem
October: P.J. Hoover
October: Courtney Sheinmel

Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

My Blue House Office

authors January 3rd, 2008

My Messy Studio

My office is messy, as messy as a raven’s nest, as Michael Langley puts it on this site about British authors and their studios or writing rooms.

Several years ago, my husband and I bought a 3-story, 100+ year-old Victorian house in downtown Little Rock in the historic Quapaw Quarter. It was painted a lovely Turquoise Blue and we’ve left it that way. It now houses my husband’s business–and my office. I love coming to work. I like leaving the house, housework, cooking, etc. behind and coming to an office dedicated to work. I drop off my son at school, come and work, pick him up and then go home. 90% of my work is done here. Sure, I take my flash drive home and play around, or I read at home, or think. But my actual work is done in the Blue House.

I’m actually in the process of moving to a different room in the Blue House, my third space to occupy, to meet the needs of my husbands changing configuration of employees. Shrug. That’s fine. It’s not which space I occupy that matters, but that I have an office in the Blue House. The important thing is that I feel legitimized by having an office outside my home.

Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

Wanted: Your Studio Story

authors, links January 3rd, 2008

Wanted: Your Studio/Office/Room Story

Where do you work? At home? In a separate office?
Is your office messy or clean?

I love this series of links to British authors and their studios or writing rooms. I haven’t seen a comparable resource for US writers or illustrators.

I find these writer’s rooms entirely too neat: Kate Mosse, Penelope Lively and Jacqueline Wilson. Love Julie Myerson’s cat, the Lizard. Hilary Mantel’s room is too blank for me. I love Michael Longley’s description of his office as “untidy as a raven’s nest,” but when you see the picture, he’s got it wrong. Instead, you need to see Russell Hoban’s office for an “Untidy Raven’s Nest.” Of course, I love that because my office is mostly messy. I hear teachers telling my kids that organization is a skill they need to succeed in life and then I look at my office and despair!

Please join me in creating a resource for teachers, writers and others interested in seeing where writers produce their work.

Here’s how it will work:

  1. Write a posting on your website or blog about your writing studio/office/room. As you can see from the article above, it’s really fun to see a photo of your studio in all its messy glory and to hear something of what the writer thinks of his/her studio.
  2. Send me a link to your posting. Please indicate exactly how you want your name listed. I won’t list any book titles here, at all, just names, please. That means you’ll probably want links on your posting to other sections of your website or blog.

When I get a dozen or so links to start, I’ll put up a permanent page linking to these and then let the Writer’s Studio List grow from there. I’ll publicize it to teachers and others as I see that it will be helpful.

Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

Wanted: Your Revision Story

authors, revision January 3rd, 2008

Wanted: Your Revision Story

As part of an ongoing feature, I’d like to hear your revision story.

Authors

Kirby Larson
Dori Butler
Kristin Wolden Nitz
Alan Gratz

Class of 2k8 Authors

These are authors with debut novels in 2008.
Jody Feldman
Kristin O’Donnell Tubb
Coming:
April: Zu Vincent
April: M.P. Barker
May: Sarah Prineas
June: Daphne Grab
July: N.A. Nelson
August: Laurel Snyder
September: Nancy Viau
October: Ellen Booraem
October: P.J. Hoover
October: Courtney Sheinmel

If you want to be part of this, here are questions for you to consider. Please email me the resulting story at darcy at darcypattison.com I’ll let you know when the story will be posted. While I make every effort to include stories from all authors, I reserve the right to use my discretion in accepting a story. By submitting the story, you agree that I have the non-exclusive right to include the story on my website, Revision Notes.

General Guidelines and Questions

Stories should run about 500 words and focus on a specific idea, technique, process, strategy, tool, etc. that you used in revising a novel.

  1. What is your normal process of revision?
  2. What did you do differently in revising this novel? Please be very specific. Readers are looking for fast, easy tips that they can apply to their novel revision process, too. Short excerpts showing a before and after are fine, as long as it stays within the word limit.
  3. Please end with a one or two sentence of bio and promo for the novel. Include a link to your website, if you wish, and a link to your novel on Amazon or other online distributor.
Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

Hattie Big Sky

authors, revision June 18th, 2007

Our guest today is Kirby Larson, author of Hattie Big Sky, Hattie Big Sky(Delacorte) which has received *starred reviews* in School Library Journal and Booklist; it was chosen as a December Borders Original Voice Pick and is on the Barnes & Noble Teen Discover list. It was recently named a School Library Journal Best Books of 2006, as well as being named as a Book Links Lasting Connections title. Kirby has written about her experiences with this story in her blog. (Originally posted on December 6 on Revision Notes that was hosted on Live Journal. )

Q: What was your writing experience before Hattie Big Sky?

A: I had been writing for nearly 20 years and had 4 published chapter books and a picture book to my credit.

Q: What did you learn about revision while working on Hattie Big Sky?

A: I didn’t realize I didn’t know the first thing about revising until I took Darcy’s Novel Revision Retreat. I finally “got it” that reworking a manuscript is not revising. To revise something means to re-vision it, to see it through a new lens. The workshop moved me from wordsmith to novel writer and, one short summer after taking it, I had my young adult historical completely revised. Re-visioned.

Q: What exercise was the most helpful?

A: Though I was irritated as heck at her request — demand! — that we bring our manuscripts formatted in this very particular and seemingly crazy manner, I cooperated. And was I glad I did! The Shrunken Mss exercise worked.

Q: Specifically, what did the exercise help you to do while revising?

A: I restructured scenes so they contributed more to the story certainly, but what I carry away most is that the workshop gave me a way to take that huge novel and make it manageable. I could really get a big picture view of the work, rather than remain stuck on individual scenes, chapters, etc.

Q: How long did it take for Hattie Big Sky to sell?

A: The manuscript spent ten days on an editor’s desk before I got that wonderful phone call!

If you enjoyed this post, be sure to subscribe to my RSS feed.
Sign up for my ocassional newsletter.

Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

A Real Audience

authors, revision June 14th, 2007

by Guest Blogger, Dori Butler author of Image from AmazonDo You Know The Monkey Man? and Image from Amazon
Trading Places With Tank Talbott Note from Darcy: Dori will be talking about our parallel projects of reading our novels aloud to an audience of kids. I talked some about my experiences here. Dori will talk about reading her work-in-progress novel to a class.

A Real Audience

Shh! Don?t tell my editor that I’m blogging over here. I’m supposed to be finishing up a revision of a middle grade novel right now. And since my editor reads my blog, I decided I’d better not do any more blogging until I turn that manuscript in. But I told Darcy I’d do a guest blog a long time ago, so here I am.

Darcy wanted me to talk about my experience reading my work in progress to a classroom of real, live kids last year. Basically, what I did was I wrote two new chapters of a novel each week and then I went in and read those raw chapters to a class of sixth graders.

Actually, the TEACHER read them so I could sit back and listen and watch the kids’ reactions. I also brought a page of questions I’d made up on the chapters each week. The type of questions varied from week to week’so did the wording of the questions. Sometimes they were open-ended; sometimes they were multiple choice.

But no matter how I worded the questions, I was always interested in the same basic information each week:

what did you like best about these chapters,

what did you like least,

what was boring,

what was hard to understand,

what did you have a hard time believing,

what do you think of such-and-such character,

what do you think is going to happen next?

As soon as the teacher finished reading, I’d pass out my list of questions. I wanted to make sure I got honest responses, so we always went right from reading to the questions. (I would tell them NOT to put their names on their papers.) Then we’d have around 10-15 minutes to discuss the chapters after they finished filling out my questionnaire.

I found it was valuable to have both written questions and a discussion because sometimes I heard different things in writing than I heard out loud. I kept a journal of my experience from week to week, so I thought I’d post excerpts from my first and last days reading to this class.

Day 1 (or?What I Hope to Get Out of This Experiment)

I was intrigued when Darcy told me about this experiment she was trying. Donna Jo Napoli told Darcy that she always reads her work to a live audience before it’s published, so Darcy wanted to try that, too. I read Darcy’s diary entries on the subject with great interest, all the while thinking I should try this, too. I can see the value in reading my work aloud.  I think I’m likely to HEAR things in my own work that I don?t necessarily SEE.

But that’s not the main reason I decided to give this a try. I have a problem balancing my “supplemental writing” (the writing assignments that build my resume, pay pretty well and are generally kind of interesting, but they’re not really “mine”) with my “real writing.”? It’s so easy to say yes to every assignment that comes along and then never write anything new of my own. By making a commitment to go into a classroom every week and read two new chapters, I know I”ll continue to make progress on my new novel. And by the time the school year is over, I should have a completed draft of this book.

That’s my real goal here–to end the school year with a draft of a new novel.

So my main goal is a little different from Darcy’s. I’m also going into the classroom at a completely different stage in the writing process than Darcy did. I’ve only written about five chapters of the book I?m planning to read to the kids. Darcy had a complete draft of a manuscript. A complete draft that she’d already spent substantial time revising. So this may not go as well for me as it went for Darcy.

My “relationship” to my chosen classroom is also different from Darcy’s. Darcy knew the teacher she approached, but she didn’t know any of the kids. My original plan was to go into a classroom where I didn’t know the kids, either. Preferably a sixth grade classroom because my story is probably a “low YA.” My youngest son is in sixth grade, so I was going to contact a sixth grade teacher at one of the other schools in town. But when my son heard I was going to do that, he got upset. He really wanted me to come and do this in HIS classroom. And well,I know his teacher pretty well. We already had a relationship before the start of this year.

So I got to thinking: 1) it won’t be long before my sixth grader doesn’t want me to come into his classroom, so I may as well take advantage of that while I can;

2) I already have a relationship with this teacher: if I find this to be a useful exercise, I might want to do it again in future years. And it would be easiest to work with the same teacher;

3) I’ve been volunteering in my son’s classes since he was in first grade. For five years I?ve been telling this same group of kids what they need to do to improve their writing; so now it’s their turn to tell me how to improve my writing! The only problem is I don’t know if I’ll be able to trust them to be completely open and honest with me. They know me, so we may have a little “sitting on Grandma’s lap” effect and they’ll just tell me everything is wonderful. Though with five years of frustration built up, it could go the other way, too. They may tell me my chapters are awful just to get back at me for all the times I?ve made them rewrite things they thought they had finished. Only time will tell?

My final day (or?What I Actually Got Out of This Experiment)

I am so glad I did this!

I wanted to complete a draft of a new novel this school year, and I did that. I also got a sense of whether going in to a classroom of real kids and reading from my work was useful to me (it was) and educational for the kids (the teacher says it was), and I learned way more than I ever expected to learn. I learned how to phrase questions so that I’d get the most useful response out of the kids (yes, you CAN train kids to be good critiquers!); I learned how to read the kids faces; I learned what?s working in this story and what’s not; I learned what kids respond to and what they don’t.

This experiment forced me to take a closer look at my own writing process. Every week I analyzed what I was doing in this story and why I was doing it. Eventually, I became less fearful of “taking a risk” (just showing up every week to read chapters in draft form was a risk!), more willing to try new things.

As I told Darcy last week, this is really my first experience writing a TRUE first draft. Usually, I rewrite so much as I go along that by the time I get to the end, the manuscript is well beyond the “first draft” stage. But I didn’t have the luxury of going back and rewriting so much this time around. not when I had this commitment to produce two new chapters every week.

Having a true first draft is really exciting! I feel like there are all these possibilities open to me for revision, new avenues to explore. I already know what the story is about. I know my characters. I know where the strengths and weaknesses in the story are. I can go anywhere from here. And I can build on those strengths in order to fix the weaknesses.

Darcy talks about “seeing the shape” of a novel/ I’ve never really been able to do that before, but I see the shape of this one! (I see where I need mold the story into shape!) I certainly got frustrated with this experiment part-way through, though–especially when I faced a blank screen two days before I was supposed to go in to school and I had no idea what was going to happen next in the story.

I’ve never forced myself to write through the frustration like this before. But I discovered that interesting things can happen when you force yourself to write through frustration. All in all, I’m glad I read this book to the kids as I wrote it rather than after I had a complete draft.

But I wondered how good it was for the kids to hear something that wasn’t polished? So I asked the kids and the teacher what they thought–were they glad I came with a rough draft or did they wish I’d come with something that was more polished?

It was interesting to hear that the majority of the class (as well as the teacher!) preferred that I come at this stage. That’s not to say I’ll always do it this way.  I’d like to try going in with a more polished draft sometime, too, just to see how the experience differs. But I get the impression it’s easier on the school schedule for me to come once a week over many weeks than it would be for me to come several times a week for fewer weeks (which is how I’d want to do it if I had a polished draft.  I’d be too impatient to just go once a week in that case).

I thought it was interesting that the reason most of them liked hearing the rough draft is they felt they were in a better position to be of some help. And they DID help–but not necessarily in ways they think they did. For instance, I’m not necessarily going to change a plot element or a character’s name just because several of them said I should.

Like Darcy said, “I’m not writing a book by committee.”

Still, just getting a sense of what they responded to in the story, and taking their answers to the various questions into account gives me a better sense of what’s important to my audience (both as average kids and as readers).

For instance, while friends are clearly very important to kids at this age, their parents are still MORE important. And it’s important for me as a writer to know what to do with that information. Also, kids crave ACTION in their stories. I knew that, but I’m not sure I really got it until I had the experience of reading to them. So I?ll have to think about that chase scene in the middle of the book.  It’s a terrible scene. I was thinking I’d get rid of it altogether. But several of the kids listed that scene as their favorite scene in the entire book. I suspect they’re remembering it to be a better scene than it actually was. I think what really grabbed them about that scene is it/s an action scene. So even if that scene doesn’t make it into the next draft, I will be more aware of action in my stories and its placement in the story.

Will I read a story aloud to a group of kids again sometime? Absolutely!

how to add a hit counter to a website

Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend

Seeing the Shape of a Novel

authors, revision June 13th, 2007

by Guest Blogger Kristin O’Donnell Tubb

Seeing the Shape of a Novel

Here are the facts:

AUTUMN WINIFRED OLIVER DOES THINGS DIFFERENT had racked up a number of rejections since I started submitting it in 2005. Then I attended Darcy’s Novel Revision Workshop in July 2006. I revamped the entire story using the techniques Darcy taught. The very first editor who read the revised manuscript bought the book.

The technique that I particularly adore is Darcy’s “Shrunken Manuscript” exercise. If you are a visual learner (like myself), this technique allows you to visualize your narrative arc. Darcy described it an interview with Cynthia Leitich-Smith: “Basically, you single-space a manuscript and then shrink the manuscript to a small font and print it out. This allows you to mark and see the overall structure of a long story like a novel.? It’s so deceptively simple, you’ll wonder why you never tried this before. It’s so amazingly useful, you’ll wonder how you ever revised without it.

Shrunken Manuscripts Work Because. . .

In my case, AUTUMN shrinks down from a 140-page behemoth to a tidy 28 pages. I use my Shrunken Manuscript in every aspect of the revision process. When my editor asked me to flesh out my main character’s sister, I laid out my’ pages on the living room floor and highlighted all the scenes in which she appeared. Then, I highlighted all the scenes in which she could grace us with her presence (she’d be delighted to know we think of her in this way).

A pattern emerged, and the task of making Katie more Katie-ish was manageable and (dare I say it about the revision process?!) fun! It somehow feels easier to experiment with changes within the Shrunken Manuscript. Perhaps because you’re marking up 30 pages instead of 150. Perhaps because you’re moving that block of text two pages instead of 18. Perhaps because your words seem more disposable in 8-point font. Whatever the reason, I’m forever grateful to Darcy for sharing this technique. To her, I say: Thank you!

Kirby Larson, author of the Newbery Honor book, Hattie Big Sky, also uses the Shrunken Manuscript technique. See her comments here.

-About the book: Autumn Winifred Oliver has charmed a hive of bees, wrangled a flock of geese, and filched a stick of dynamite from the U.S. Government. But it?ll take a whole new kind of gumption to save her Cades Cove home. AUTUMN WINIFRED OLIVER DOES THINGS DIFFERENT is due Fall 2008 from Delacorte Press. -About the author: Kristin O?Donnell Tubb has written a number of magazine articles and activity books for children. AUTUMN is her first novel. Please visit her at www.creativefreelancewriting.com.

If you enjoyed this post, be sure to subscribe to my RSS feed.
Sign up for my ocassional newsletter.

Email This Post to a Friend Email This Post to a Friend